Stop Software Patents European Petition

Cold War

There is no protection against the patents of your competitors other than a massive counterthreat. It's all about balance of terror, like in the Cold War.
In the nuclear arms race of the 1970's and 1980's, both the United States and the Soviet Union had the power to wipe each other out. But none of them ever used a nuclear weapon against the other because they knew that it would have resulted in the overkill, the end of the world.

Large patent arsenals are also like nuclear weapons. If an IBM and a Siemens were to fight each other over their countless patents, it's quite possible that neither of them would survive. Siemens holds so many patents that IBM can't ensure that none of its products "infringes" upon them, and vice versa. Each company could attack many of the other company's products with patent "infringement" allegations. The mere cost of the lawsuits would amount to billions, and customers would run away in spades. So like the Americans and the Soviets, they'd never pull the trigger.

"Unfortunately, as a defensive strategy, Oracle has been forced to protect itself by selectively applying for patents which will present the best opportunities for cross-licensing between Oracle and other companies who may allege patent infringement."
Oracle Corporation Patent Policy
Between the large corporations, there are formal and informal non-aggression pacts concerning patents. Formal means: They sign a "cross-licensing agreement", under which each party is officially allowed to use all of the other party's patents, or a so-called "covenant not to sue". Informal means: They don't sign anything but there is an understanding that they won't do any harm to each other.

"Our position is clear: software patents are an outright threat to free software. On the other hand, we are currently still applying for such patents, for the same reason that one needs a gun when everyone else is running around with guns."
Simon Phipps, Chief Open Source Officer at Sun Microsystems, 2007
Cross-licensing deals show the absurdity of the patent system. Large companies give each other, i.e. their biggest competitors, full access to their entire patent portfolios, but still pretend that patents were necessary to protect innovation. Real protection is not cross-licensed. Could you imagine a book publisher allowing his biggest competitor to publish all of his books? It would be suicide.

Click to read why patents are unjust and favour big business over innovative SMEs

Leave a comment on our forum (external)
Apr. 2007: New Patent Proposals: Single EU patent law good for US giants, bad for small EU firms >>
Feb. 2007: EPLA contradicts EU law >>
Jan. 2007: EU Council Presidency - SME call for change in patent policy >>
Dec. 2006: - Forum available again >>
Dec. 2006: Commission's DG Internal Market achieves Worst Lobby Award >>
Dec. 2006: FFII President says current patent system not sustainable >>
Dec. 2006: McCreevy laments unpopular EPLA >>
Nov. 2006: Patent industry writes ICT task force report "on behalf of SMEs"
  >> FFII press release
  >> Techworld article
Nov. 2006: FFII announces the European Patent Conference (EUPACO): "Towards a New European Patent System" >>
Oct. 2006: European Parliament turns around EPLA resolution >>
Mar. 2006: Software patent critics respond to EU Commission's consultation paper on patent policy
  >> FFII press release
  >> Florian Mueller blog
Jan. 2006: EU software patents rear their ugly head again
  >> IDG article
  >> Euractiv article
  >> ZDNet article
Parliament says No to software patents >> becomes an FFII platform
  >> Press Release
  >> ZDNet article
Creative Commons License 

  Català    Česky    Deutsch    Eesti    English    Ελληνικά    Español    Français    Italiano  
  Latviski    Lietuviškai    Magyar    Nederlands    Polski    Português    Suomi    Svenska