The legislative process on an EU software patent directive
has been going on for several years. It is now in the
decisive stage where a final decision may (or may not)
be made within months.
The far-fetched interpretation of the European Patent
Convention by the European Patent Office resulted in major
discrepancies between national jurisdictions.
Those who tried to enforce software patents that the EPO had
granted could not do so on a dependable basis. In some countries,
judges tended to not recognize those patents, and in others,
they were more inclined to do so. There is even some
inconsistency between how courts within the same country,
or different judges at the same court, ruled on attempts to
enforce such software patents.
The EU Commission decided that it was time to have EU-wide
uniformity with respect to software patents, but its initiative
is about much more than that.
It's certainly correct to
say that a single market such as the EU should have a maximum
level of consistency for everything related to commerce. There
should not be a fundamental difference between the enforceability
of the very same patent in, for instance, the UK versus Italy.
However, the Internal Market Commissioner who took the initiative
(Frits Bolkestein) set out goals beyond that. He also wanted to
effectively extend the scope of patentability.
An EU directive on software patents can only have an
indirect effect on the European Patent Office.
The EPO is not an EU institution, and it is therefore not
formally bound to any EU legislation. It is governed by the
European Patent Convention of 1973, which is a separate
multi-national treaty to which non-EU countries such as
Switzerland are also members. However, there is a huge
overlap between the member countries of the EU and those
of the European Patent Convention. Practically, the overlap
between both memberships is well over 90% of the market
opportunity. Therefore, if the EPO granted patents that
are not recognized in EU member states, it would end up
having many unhappy customers that don't get much
practical value out of such patents.
Click here to read about
the co-decision procedure of the EU